The ab-initio determination of crystal structures typically requires highly complete single-crystal diffraction data, i.e. diffraction intensities should have been measured for almost all unique reflections. The reason for this is that, if many more reflections have been measured, than there exist atoms within the structure, the sparseness (peaked nature) of the real-space representation of the charge density (in the case of X-rays) or potential (in the case of electrons) can be utilized to solve the crystallographic phase problem (e.g. by direct methods, or charge flipping, or similar kinematic scattering based techniques). While electron diffraction has the great advantage over X-ray or neutron diffraction, that very small crystallites are already sufficient to produce such single crystal patterns, multiple scattering of electrons within the material generally prevents electron diffraction data to be used in as quantitatively a manner as X-ray or neutron data. This limits the application of electron diffraction tomography [1] to samples that are small along at least two dimensions (e.g. rods), and makes the investigation of other geometries (e.g. platelets) generally more difficult.
It is a well-established truth that, if electron diffraction data corresponding to a few different dynamical diffraction conditions is available, the relative phases of the structure factors that correspond to this data are uniquely determined. This fact is being exploited in structure-factor refinement by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction (QCBED) [2,3]. Applying the same real-space constraints as are used for solving the crystallographic phase problem from kinematical diffraction data, a lot less properly phased structure factors are necessary to find the corresponding arrangement of atoms than would be the case if the phases were not known.
In this talk I will show that by applying the recently developed large-angle rocking-beam electron diffraction (LARBED) technique [4], as implemented in the QED plugin [5] for DigitalMicrograph (Gatan), highly quantitative dynamical electron diffraction data sufficient to solve the structure can be acquired from nanocrystals even without tilting the specimen at all.
[1] U. Kolb, E. Mugnaioli, T. E. Gorelik, Cryst. Res. Technol. 46 (2011) 542 – 554
[2] C. Deininger, G. Necker, J. Mayer, Ultramicroscopy 54 (1994) 15-30
[3] J.-M. Zuo, M. Kim, M. O’Keefe, J.C.H. Spence, Nature 401 (1999) 49
[4] C.T. Koch, Ultramicroscopy 111 (2011) 828 – 840
[5] http://www.hremresearch.com
[6] C.T. Koch and J.C.H. Spence, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 36 (2003) 803-816
Financial support by the Carl Zeiss Foundation as well as the German Research Foundation (DFG, Grant No. KO 2911/7-1) is acknowledged.